“Green competition law”, one of the most important topics in contemporary competition policy, is starting to take more shape in the EU.
On 10 September, following around 200 feedback contributions from stakeholders and an international conference on the subject, the EU Commission published a new Policy Brief (the “Brief”), accompanied by an official speech at the 25th IBA Competition Conference. This marks the next stage in its review as to how European competition law can support a more sustainable, environmentally friendly economy, thus fostering not just the implementation of the EU’s Green Deal and “Fit for 55” package but also the battle against climate change more generally.
A generational project with huge and immediate consequences for all sectors of the economy, this challenge has to be taken on by companies and consumers alike. While its exact implications for competition law have been hotly debated in recent years and a lot of the specifics still appear uncertain, the Brief clearly underscores that its sees competition policy as something that “supports and complements” its broader Green Deal policies. It also sketches out its thinking on specific legal aspects of European antitrust law, merger control and state aid. This article focusses on the Brief’s antitrust implications and describes our views on the Commission’s reasoning what to expect going forward
First and foremost, the Commission is eager to stress how much weight it is going to continue to put on rigorous enforcement of European antitrust rules. So while climate change presents a monumental threat to deal with, companies must not expect to be able to get away with a “greenwashed defence” when engaging in cartels. At the same time – and this is a first clarification hoped for by many observers – the Commission explicitly acknowledges “that in order to encourage companies to jointly invest, identify solutions, produce, and distribute sustainable products, more guidance is needed on the circumstances in which such cooperation complies with antitrust rules”, meaning: yes, it is definitely possible for competitors to engage in “green cooperation” without automatically falling foul of antitrust rules.
However, there won’t be any automatic “greenlighting” either. Rather, as has been the case for joint production, R&D cooperation and other projects for many years now, companies will generally have to make their own specific assessment as to the compatibility of their plans with EU antitrust rules. The Commission has identified several “pain points” in the assessment process where it aims to improve its guidance in the future, thus decreasing legal risk for companies’ “green” projects. These are:
It’s also worth pointing out that the Commission reiterates the importance of its agricultural policy. Green farming methods can play a pivotal role in the bloc’s endeavour to become carbon-free and more environmentally sustainable (e.g. by lowering pollution from pesticides and carbon emissions by livestock or efforts to better protect biodiversity). For that reason, a new provision in the Common Market Organisation Regulation was agreed on in June this year, exempting from the application of Article 101(1) TFEU sustainability agreements that are concluded between producers and/or other actors from the food value chain and which are aimed at achieving higher standards than required by law in terms of environmental protection, climate change prevention, animal health and animal welfare (see here, Article 210a). This in an agriculture-specific derogation overriding the general rule in Article 101(3) TFEU and providing farmers with the opportunity to adopt greener practices in agriculture in exchange for various benefits such as higher prices for their proceeds and longer-term supply relationships. However, and similar to Article 101(3) TFEU, this also requires that the restrictions of competition resulting from the sustainability agreements in place are indispensable for the achievement of the desired outcome. The Commission will issue guidelines on the conditions of applicability of this derogation by the beginning of 2024.
From a “saving the planet” perspective, the Brief broadly suggests a welcome and useful update to antitrust enforcement that may result in more legal certainty for companies engaging in projects that seek to improve sustainability, minimise the carbon footprint or to create other environmental benefits with an effect in the EU. Through the lens of antitrust doctrine, however, a number of points seem elusive and need to be fleshed out further in the months to come:
Still, the question remains if truly promoting the Green Deal would not call for a more flexible approach also allowing for mere cross-market efficiencies or out-of-market efficiencies, i.e. to exempt cooperation where the benefits outweighing the disadvantages only occur on another market and/or where benefits clearly exist but cannot be pinned to a specific market at all. Notably, there is nothing in the wording of Article 101(3) TFEU that would keep the Commission from doing so – in fact, one may argue that other provisions in the Treaty concerning the consideration of any environmental impact in EU policies and principles (i.e., Articles 191(2) and 11 TFEU) even require a very flexible approach in this area. Indeed, the concepts of “in-market efficiencies” and specific apportionment of benefits to certain consumers are based on the Commission’s own guidelines and nothing in the law or the case law of the European Courts would appear to prevent the Commission from changing its view. In fact, before the publication of the aforementioned guidelines in 2004, the Commission had already adopted a decision concerning more eco-friendly washing machines where it found: “Such environmental results for society would adequately allow consumers a fair share of the benefits even if no benefits accrued to individual purchasers of machines”.
By not reverting to that stance, the Commission objects to more progressive views expressed as part of its call for contributions. Respondents argued, inter alia, that the scope of relevant benefits needs to be extended to benefits that occur outside the relevant, investigated markets, that the notion of “consumers” needs to be expanded to encompass not only users of the products but also citizens and society as a whole and/or that a more flexible interpretation of the notion of “fair share” is warranted (in order to allow benefits from an agreement to be credited even if they do not fully compensate for the harm suffered by consumers in the market). Notably, the Dutch Competition Authority – which had published respective (recently renewed) draft guidelines last year already – is one of the most prominent proponents of such approach, with similar views being taken in Greece and the Austrian legislator having adopted a reform of its national competition law to the same effect.
This deflates a bit the “green cooperation”-friendly notion that, generally, consumer preferences alone can be sufficient to generate the “benefit” required for an exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU. If the interpretation of “indispensability” set out in the Brief prevails, companies seeking to defend their cooperation based on consumers’ willingness to pay more for eco-friendly products may very well face an uphill battle, having to argue that despite consumer interest (and resulting lack of any first mover disadvantage) they still need to band together with competitors to achieve the desired outcome. Conversely, if consumers are showing no discernible interest in a sustainable product, an important potential “benefit” that might warrant an exemption under Article 101(3) TFEU – and which the Commission advocates in its Brief – could not credibly be achieved by any cooperation (hampering its implementation under antitrust rules). In that regard, it would help if the Commission were to give more specific guidance and in particular communicate clearly that proven consumer inertia (i.e., tentativeness to actually buy more sustainable products despite a general interest in them) can already be sufficient to exempt competitor cooperation from Article 101(1) TFEU – at least if it is clear that only a concerted change of product features or product ranges will actually change demand in a way promoting the “Green Deal”. This would be a meaningful way to navigate market failures while maintaining the integrity of competition law and supporting the EU’s green ambition.
On the other hand, that line of thought may just underscore that competition law – of which market definition, effects analysis and consumer welfare are core elements –simply has its limits when combating climate change.
The above shows that there is still a lot of work to be done, with antitrust implications just being one angle considered in the Brief. There will likely also be significant developments in state aid and merger control laws. Concerning the latter, the Commission in particular discusses strengthening its enforcement whenever a transaction concerns possible harm to “green” innovation (including tackling green “killer acquisitions” where an incumbent industry player with no eco-friendly business buys smaller companies that innovate in sustainable products, technologies etc.) and reflecting on the impact of sustainability aspects and related regulations on consumer preferences, competitive effects, and market definition; in order to review green “killer acquisitions”, the Commission suggests to rely on its new referral policy under Article 22 EUMR. In state aid, the favouring of funding of non-fossil fuels and enhancing possibilities to support innovation are envisaged, based in particular on the Commission’s new Climate, Energy and Environment Aid Guidelines and its revision of the General Block Exemption Regulation.
With regard to antitrust law, the above has shown there are important changes to come and that the Commission can be expected to reflect on these issues together with national competition authorities, stakeholders and experts. Companies should be on the lookout to see whether and how more progressive stakeholders such as the Dutch competition authority will shape further discussions and result in a re-thinking on the Commission’s part.
But in any event, the need for more guidance remains. The Commission intends to continue down this path with a two-pronged approach: It seeks to provide more guidance in the context of the revisions of its block exemptions and guidelines on horizontal cooperation and vertical agreements, which are currently ongoing and are supposed to result in new rules by the end of December and May 2022, respectively. And to inform the policy revision and ensure that guidance can be as concrete as possible, the authority also encourages companies to approach its officials with their projects. In particular, the Commission would like to shed more light on when existing (environmental) regulation already incentivises companies to produce in a sustainable manner and therefore obviates the need for cooperation, and when such incentives are not sufficient to do so.
It is important to note that the Commission has clearly voiced its intention to consider requests by companies for individual guidance letters even before it has finalized further general guidance. So whenever companies envisage any kind of “green cooperation” or consider sustainability initiatives that raise novel issues, they should now more than ever think of proactively approaching the Commission to gain legal certainty. In that regard, the Commission has also stressed that, where the public interest so requires, it will consider adopting decisions pursuant to Article 10 of Regulation 1/2003 finding that the competition rules are not applicable to certain sustainability initiatives.
A lot is at stake here: Companies need more clarity on how the pursuit of sustainability objectives affects antitrust assessment, as the risk of breaching competition rules can deter from investing in sustainable products or processes, such as industry-wide agreements to phase out unsustainable products and/or unethical modes of production, joint procurement of sustainable input products, joint R&D, innovation and production agreements, or the setting industry standards for the use of sustainable products and green technologies.
One can only hope that companies and regulators take on this challenge whole-heartedly and that the seeds they’re going to plant will yield the fruit needed to take on this massive task.
[View source.]
See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Hogan Lovells var today = new Date(); var yyyy = today.getFullYear();document.write(yyyy + ” “); | Attorney Advertising
Refine your interests »
This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.
Back to Top
Explore 2021 Readers’ Choice Awards
Copyright © var today = new Date(); var yyyy = today.getFullYear();document.write(yyyy + ” “); JD Supra, LLC
buy tadalafil where to get tadalafil
tadalafil without a doctor prescription prescription tadalafil online
generic cialis online fast shipping https://cialistrxy.com/
tadalafil price walmart https://cialiswbtc.com/
tadalafil without a doctor prescription https://cialisbusd.com/
tadalafil liquid where to buy cialis without prescription
prescription tadalafil online cheap cialis pills for sale
cialis tadalafil tadalafil brands
where to buy tadalafil on line generic tadalafil from uk
where to buy generic cialis online safely tadalafil
https://cialistrxy.com/ tadalafil without a doctor prescription
where to buy tadalafil on line tadalafil side effects
tadalafil order online no prescription tadalafil daily online
buy cialis pills tadalafil cialis
https://extratadalafill.com/ side effects of tadalafil
tadalafil generic where to buy buy cialis pills
cost of cialis buy cialis
buy tadalafil https://cialisicp.com/
generic cialis tadalafil buy cialis pills
what is tadalafil cost tadalafil generic
side effects for tadalafil https://cialismat.com/
generic tadalafil from uk where to buy generic cialis online safely
https://cialisusdc.com/ tadalafil online
tadalafil generic cialis at canadian pharmacy
tadalafil without a doctor prescription what is tadalafil
tadalafil side effects cialis without prescription
tadalafil liquid tadalafil blood pressure
tadalafil cost walmart where to buy generic cialis online safely
where to buy tadalafil on line tadalafil order online no prescription
cheap generic cialis for sale canada generic tadalafil
buy generic cialis online with mastercard cialis tadalafil
tadalafil order online no prescription https://cialisvet.com/
tadalafil liquid best price usa tadalafil
buy tadalafil https://extratadalafill.com/
tadalafil liquid tadalafil cialis
cost of cialis cost of cialis
https://cialiswbtc.com/ cost tadalafil generic
tadalafil online canada tadalafil +
100 mg sildenafil sildenafil iv
buy generic cialis online with mastercard buy generic cialis online with mastercard
tadalafil tablets 40 mg where to buy tadalafil in singapore
sildenafil without a doctor prescription usa sildenafil shelf life
https://cialismat.com/ buy cialis
tadalafil price walmart tadalafil cost walmart
prescription tadalafil online prescription tadalafil online
buying viagra on line viagra prescription uk
ivermectin 9 mg ivermectin iv
tadalafil and tamsulosin and blood pressure mint tadalafil
ivermectin 3 mg dose ivermectin 50 mg
tadalafil 20 mg online pharmacy tadalafil 5mg canada
mixing tadalafil and sildenafil what are the side effects of sildenafil 20 mg?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts about was.
Regards
cost of ivermectin 3mg tablets buy ivermectin cream
ivermectin 6mg ivermectin 1 cream generic
My spouse and I stumbled over here different website and
thought I might check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you.
Look forward to looking over your web page for a second time.
where can i buy oral ivermectin stromectol tablets 3 mg
tadalafil price walmart tadalafil goodrx
buy ivermectin uk ivermectin buy nz
ivermectin otc ivermectin 50
Hey there! This post couldn’t be written any better! Reading this post reminds me of my old room mate!
He always kept chatting about this. I will forward this write-up
to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read.
Thank you for sharing!
ivermectin 6 mg tablets stromectol drug
ivermectin cost ivermectin 6 mg tablets
stromectol 12mg ivermectin 15 mg
ivermectin 2 ivermectin buy
ivermectin eye drops cost of ivermectin 3mg tablets
ivermectin 6mg tablet for lice ivermectin cost
Why users still use to read news papers when in this technological globe
everything is available on net?
My partner and I stumbled over here coming from a different website and thought I should check things out.
I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to finding out about
your web page yet again.
viagra buy viagra canada
Good day! This is my first visit to your blog!
We are a team of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche.
Your blog provided us valuable information to work on. You have done a extraordinary job!
ivermectin lotion for lice buy stromectol canada
Currently it seems like Drupal is the top blogging platform out there right
now. (from what I’ve read) Is that what you’re using
on your blog?
Great items from you, man. I have be mindful your stuff prior to and you are just too great.
I actually like what you have bought here, really like what you’re stating and the best way in which you say it.
You’re making it enjoyable and you continue to care for
to stay it smart. I can not wait to learn far more from
you. That is really a tremendous site.
п»їcialis cialis brand
tadalafil medication tadalafil 20mg side effects
sildenafil compared to viagra cupid 50 sildenafil citrate tablets
where to buy viagra usa viagra generic brand
cost of generic viagra in india buy sildenafil generic canada
walmart cialis generic cialis in canada
pharmacy discount card canada drug pharmacy review
no prescription required pharmacy comfortis canadian pharmacy
walmart pharmacy (inside walmart) Yasmin
levitra 20mg bayer vital levitra side effects blood pressure
tadalafil price tadalafil canada
liquid ivermectin for dogs durvet ivermectin paste equine dewormer
generic viagra lowest price how can i get viagra in australia
generic cialis release date metoprolol and cialis
what does ivermectin treat in dogs is ivermectin safe for pregnant goats
online class for pharmacy technician international online pharmacy
what are the side effect of cialis cialis discount pharmacy
cost of levitra 20 mg comprar levitra
canadian pharmacy painkillers online pharmacy tech jobs
where to get viagra no prescription generic viagra price canada
cialis vs viagra vs levitra how to save money on cialis
clark howard canadian pharmacy vipps pharmacy canada
tricare pharmacy online online pharmacy without prescription
online pharmacy us canadian pharmacy com
singapore online pharmacy jan pharmacy canada
pharmacy evaluating exam canada top canada drugs reviews
buy cialis online canada pharmacy Dostinex
online pharmacy oxycodone pharmacy no prescription required
modafinil online buy modafinil 200mg over the counter
pharmacy technician jobs in canada wal mart store pharmacy
Saved as a favorite, I really like your site!
canadian pharmacy retin a sams club pharmacy
Fine way of explaining, and pleasant piece of writing to take information concerning my presentation focus,
which i am going to present in academy.
order modafinil 100mg for sale
buy modafinil pills oral modafinil 100mg modafinil pills
order provigil 200mg sale provigil 200mg brand
generic provigil 200mg buy modafinil 200mg generic
order generic provigil purchase provigil without prescription buy provigil 100mg pills
deaths from prescription drugs remote consultation online pharmacy
order provigil 100mg for sale order provigil 100mg online cheap oral provigil 100mg
order modafinil pill modafinil cheap provigil without prescription
buy generic provigil 200mg cost provigil
http://erythromycin1m.com/# how to take erythromycin
provigil ca
cost modafinil 100mg modafinil 200mg generic
buy provigil without prescription modafinil sale
provigil price order modafinil 100mg online buy generic provigil
erythromycin ethylsuccinate