DAN WOOTTON: How can those supposed to protect the legacy of Winston Churchill betray him so badly? – Daily Mail

By Dan Wootton for MailOnline


Walk into the office past a row of swastika flags, with a quick Sieg Heil salute to the portrait of the late Führer Adolf Hitler before jumping in the lift.
Without the bravery and leadership of the greatest Briton to ever live, that’s a routine that millions of us in the UK – a bleak Nazi-occupied German colony – might well be following today.
No Prime Minister or Western leader in recent history has come close to the lasting positive impact Sir Winston Churchill had on all our lives.
But as part of the regressive wokery currently sweeping the world, the campaign to demean Churchill has now reached the very organisation meant to protect his unquestionable legacy.
Did Churchill have some racist, sexist, homophobic and other unsavoury views that were widespread among men born in 1874? Without doubt – and I’m not trying to deny that.
But he was the ultimate anti-fascist who played a significant role in preventing the extermination of Jews and every other minority Hitler was intending to literally wipe from the face of the earth.
So I am boiling with rage today at news the one woman who should be fighting against the loony left’s bid to piss on the reputation of Churchill is the person attempting to cancel him.
I am boiling with rage today at news the one woman who should be fighting against the loony left’s bid to piss on the reputation of Churchill is the person attempting to cancel him. Pictured: Sir Winston and Julia Weston, the chief executive of the re-named Churchill Fellowship
The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust has been re-named the Churchill Fellowship, with all pictures of the great man removed from its website and the addition of a number of notes about the former PM’s ‘unacceptable’ views.
This was the brainchild of Julie Weston, the charity’s £100,000-a-year chief executive.
This madness is playing into the hands of the loony left, like the idiots who defaced the Churchill statue in Parliament Square with graffiti saying ‘is a racist’ during the febrile Black Lives Matter protests last summer.
This morning, after the news was first revealed, Weston attempted some unconvincing damage control.
Churchill’s photo was reinstated on the website and she claimed the name change was because it was ‘confusing’ and nothing to do with wanting to ‘disown’ Winston’s work.
But that makes absolutely no sense.
The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust is immediately synonymous with the wartime leader, while The Churchill Fellowship could well be confused with the omnipresent insurance company that regularly advertises on TV.
What makes it obvious that Weston is a woketopian is that, as she announced these changes, she also revealed the charity would start to focus on ‘addressing inequality and protecting the environment’. Er, why? There are multiple other charitable organisations that already do that.
This charity was set up immediately after Churchill’s death in 1965 to fund academic research, using funding mainly from a grateful public determined to properly recognise the towering historic figure.
Those donations, which were invested, continue to fund the charity today, alongside donations and legacies from wills.
The original Winston Churchill Memorial Trust name was removed from the charity’s website, as was a picture of the great man
The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust is changing its name to the Churchill Fellowship (pictured) as part of a rebrand
It was the charity’s volunteers, who remain steadfastly loyal to Churchill and his legacy, who blew the whistle on the outrage.
One told The Sun: ‘It beggars belief that the man who saved this nation in our darkest hour finds himself cancelled in this way.’
I have no doubt that’s exactly what the left are attempting to do.
The BBC is, of course, part of the revisionist mob. They were forced to partially uphold a complaint about a News At Ten report that said Churchill’s attitude towards the Bengal Famine, which killed three million in India during 1943, was racist without offering an alternative view.
In fact, many historians counter that Churchill did his absolute best to alleviate the famine at a time when food supplies across the world were scarce and he was engaged in trying to defeat Japan in the Pacific.
If we continue to woke-wash every white person from history because they were subjects of their time, then Queen Victoria, Charles Dickens and Shakespeare will be finished too.
Find me someone rich, powerful, talented or influential from 100 years ago who didn’t have a questionable view.
That’s the way societies evolve.
The new website has a page stating that the charity ‘stands in solidarity with those in the fight against racism and with our Fellows from minoritised racial communities’. It added: ‘Today there is controversy about aspects of Sir Winston’s life. Many of his views on race are widely seen as unacceptable today, a view that we share’
Today the charity put up a new statement, with a picture of Sir Winston, praising him and denying they were cutting ties – although they will not be reverting back to the old name
Think about this from a personal perspective.
When you’re gone, do you want to be judged by the biggest mistake you made – perhaps something you repented for during your life?
Or do you think human beings are fallible and their legacy should take into account their overall achievements and foibles? If we are to apply the latter judgement to Churchill, then he remains the most brilliant and important Briton without any question.
Yes, he was a man with flaws, a man who was very much a product of the era in which he grew up – but a man who saved the world from the tyranny of Nazism that allowed us to enjoy the freedoms we have today.
And that is all that really matters.
Published by Associated Newspapers Ltd
Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday & Metro Media Group


177 thoughts on “DAN WOOTTON: How can those supposed to protect the legacy of Winston Churchill betray him so badly? – Daily Mail”

  1. Hello! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any issues with hackers?

    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing a few months of hard
    work due to no backup. Do you have any solutions
    to stop hackers?

  2. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it up!
    I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back in the future.

  3. Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just
    your articles? I mean, what you say is important and all.
    But just imagine if you added some great visuals or video clips to give your posts
    more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with pics and
    videos, this site could certainly be one of the best
    in its field. Excellent blog!

  4. It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate
    to this fantastic blog! I guess for now i’ll settle for bookmarking
    and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward
    to fresh updates and will talk about this blog with my Facebook group.
    Talk soon!

  5. Can I just say what a comfort to uncover someone who genuinely knows what they’re
    talking about on the web. You definitely realize how to bring
    a problem to light and make it important. More and more people have to look
    at this and understand this side of the story.
    I was surprised that you are not more popular since
    you most certainly possess the gift.

  6. Someone necessarily lend a hand to make seriously
    posts I might state. That is the first time I frequented your website page and thus far?
    I amazed with the analysis you made to make this particular
    submit amazing. Great process!

  7. You can certainly see your expertise within the article you write.
    The world hopes for more passionate writers such as you who are not afraid to
    mention how they believe. Always go after your heart.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.