A clean energy future isn't set in stone – Nature.com

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
Nature Geoscience (2021)
15 Accesses
34 Altmetric
Metrics details
Social scientists and geoscientists must work together to critically evaluate and develop feasible visions for a sustainable future. Is a clean-energy economy more viable than a degrowth future?
Traditionally, geoscientists study the Earth while social scientists study the human societies that inhabit it. Many disciplines such as the climate and environmental sciences cross this divide and have worked hard to bridge the gap. Nevertheless, in our experience as social scientists, a divide between these sciences persists, with geoscientists and social scientists often working in separate departments, publishing in different journals and using distinct frameworks to understand how the world works. With human societies recognized as geological agents in their own right1,2, responsible for global-scale changes of landscapes, climate and ecosystems, we argue that we need to further strengthen collaborations between the social sciences and geosciences, particularly when thinking about resource extraction, so that we can work together to ensure feasible and sustainable futures everywhere.

Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
59,00 €
only 4,92 € per issue
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
Wilkinson, B. H. Geology 33, 161–164 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 
Cooper, A. H., Brown, T. J., Price, S. J., Ford, J. R. & Waters, C. N. Anthropocene Rev. 5, 222–229 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Hoggard, M. J. et al. Nat. Geosci. 13, 504–510 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S.-H. Sci. Cult. 22, 189–196 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 
Kerschner, C., Wächter, P., Nierling, L. & Ehlers, M.-H. J. Clean. Prod. 197, 1619–1636 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Andersen, M. S. & Massa, I. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2, 337–345 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 
Buttel, F. H. Geoforum 31, 57–65 (2000).
Article  Google Scholar 
Hickel, J. & Kallis, G. New Political Econ. 25, 469–486 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Vadén, T. et al. Environ. Sci. Policy 112, 236–244 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Vadén, T. et al. Environ. Politics 30, 462–476 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Sovacool, B. K. et al. Science 367, 30–33 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Kuipers, K. J. J., van Oers, L. F. C. M., Verboon, M. & van der Voet, E. Glob. Environ. Change 49, 106–115 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Murguía, D. I., Bringezu, S. & Schaldach, R. J. Environ. Manage. 180, 409–420 (2016).
Article  Google Scholar 
Sonter, L. J. et al. Nat. Commun. 8, 1013 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Dellink, R., Chateau, J., Lanzi, E. & Magné, B. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 200–214 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Kothari, A., Demaria, F. & Acosta, A. Development 57, 362–375 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 
Kallis, G. et al. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour. 43, 291–316 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 
Millward-Hopkins, J., Steinberger, J. K., Rao, N. D. & Oswald, Y. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102168 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 
Renn, J. The Evolution of Knowledge: Rethinking Science for the Anthropocene (Princeton Univ. Press, 2020).
Book  Google Scholar 
Seidl, R. et al. Ambio 42, 5–12 (2013).
Article  Google Scholar 
Toivanen, T. et al. Anthropocene Rev. 4, 183–198 (2017).
Article  Google Scholar 
Download references
We thank A. Mol and A. Beaulieu for engaging with drafts of this article, and H. Faller for editing the work.
Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
Thomas Franssen
Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Mandy de Wilde
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Correspondence to Thomas Franssen.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Reprints and Permissions
Franssen, T., de Wilde, M. A clean energy future isn’t set in stone. Nat. Geosci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00822-0
Download citation
Published: 26 August 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00822-0

Advertisement
Advanced search
Nature Geoscience (Nat. Geosci.) ISSN 1752-0908 (online) ISSN 1752-0894 (print)
© 2021 Springer Nature Limited
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

source

101 thoughts on “A clean energy future isn't set in stone – Nature.com”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.