Select your default regional edition of MiningWeekly.com
Note: When you select a default region you will be directed to the MiningWeekly.com home page of your choice whenever you visit miningweekly.com. This setting is controlled by cookies and should your cookies be re-set you will then be directed to the regional edition associated with the geographic location of our IP address. Should your cookies be reset then you may again use the drop-down menu to select a default region.
Click on the button below to clear your default MiningWeekly.com regional edition
Note: When you clear your default region you will be directed to the MiningWeekly.com home page regional edition associated with the geographic location of our IP address.
Note: Search is limited to the most recent 250 articles. To access earlier articles, click Advanced Search and set an earlier date range.
To search for a term containing the ‘&’ symbol, click Advanced Search and use the ‘search headings’ and/or ‘in first paragraph’ options.
Please enter the email address that you used to subscribe on Mining Weekly. Your password will be sent to this address.
separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses
Benga seeks judicial review Grassy Mountain rejection
Embed VideoPopup VideoInstagram
16th August 2021
By: Creamer Media Reporter
ARTICLE ENQUIRY SAVE THIS ARTICLE EMAIL THIS ARTICLE
Font size: –+
Benga Mining, a unit of Australian billionaire Gina Rinehart’s Hancock Prospecting, has applied to the Federal Court of Canada for a judicial review of the rejection of the $800-million Grassy Mountain steelmaking coal mine that it plans to build in the Rocky Mountains of Alberta.
Benga has applied for an order that quashes or sets aside Environment and Climate Change Minister Jonathan Wilkinson's decision of August 6, that the project was “likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects” and which referred the project to the Cabinet.
Benga is also seeking to quash the Cabinet's decision that the “significant adverse environmental effects” that the project “is likely to cause are not justified in the circumstances”.
The Minister's determination was based on a decision by the Joint Review Panel on June 17, to deny the Grassy Mountain project. The determination, Benga said, was made despite applications being filed with the Court of Appeal of Alberta on July 16 and 19, 2021, by the company and the Piikani Nation and the Stoney Nakoda Nation.
Benga said that its legal counsel had written to Wilkinson on June 26, formally requesting that he took no action at this time, in order to allow Benga to pursue its legal avenues on appeal. Benga also wrote to the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada on July 6, advising that failure by the Minister to hold the federal process in abeyance pending resolution of Benga's legal challenges in the Court of Appeal of Alberta would prejudice Benga and potentially those Indigenous groups that might benefit from the project.
"We are dismayed that Canada's Minister of Environment could render a decision so hastily, and based on a report that is facing multiple legal challenges," said Benga CEO John Wallington.
"Not only were the Minister's and Cabinet's decisions premature and ill-informed, they were also made without adequate consultation with the relevant First Nations, something that is unconscionable within the rigours of a modern regulatory approval process."
Benga's parent company has reportedly spent about $700-million in acquiring the project and in pursuing the necessary regulatory approvals.
“At the time of acquiring the project, we were warmly welcomed and made to feel that Canada was very much open for business and intent upon attracting international investment and capital for the development of large-scale projects that would stimulate the economy and provide employment opportunities and jobs.
“We were acutely aware of Canada's international reputation as a destination of choice for mining projects that could be developed without political interference within an open, transparent and fair regulatory regime. However, the Minister's and Cabinet's decisions that we are now seeking to review raise serious questions about sovereign risk and just how open, transparent and fair the regulatory regime actually is,” said Wallington.
The project is a proposed steelmaking coal mine in Crowsnest Pass, Alberta. Benga noted that the project held a Category 4 land use classification (being land on which surface or underground mining may be considered) and that nearly 25% of the project was on previously mined land.
Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
Receive daily sector news alerts
We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.
Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.
Advertising on MiningWeekly.com is an effective way to build and consolidate a company’s profile among clients and prospective clients. Email email@example.com